WFB: Goldwater, the John Birch Society, and Me
LGF tipped me off to this great look at the way the consummate conservatives of the 1960’s marginalized the most dangerous foes to the modern conservative movement; the John Birch Society.
At a time when it was necessary to want to control the growing power of the Soviets, some kooks took it a bit too far. The JBS under leader Robert Welch went beyond the deep end and way out of the pool. WFB recalls how he and other conservatives felt the need to marginalize these crackpots. Speaking of Welch he wrote:
His influence was near-hypnotic, and his ideas wild. He said Dwight D. Eisenhower was a “dedicated, conscious agent of the Communist conspiracy,” and that the government of the United States was “under operational control of the Communist party.” It was, he said in the summer of 1961, “50-70 percent” Communist-controlled.
So how did Buckley and Goldwater purge the G.O.P. of these lunatics? The story shows just how masterful and important he was to the conservative cause:
Time was given to the John Birch Society lasting through lunch, and the subject came up again the next morning. We resolved that conservative leaders should do something about the John Birch Society. An allocation of responsibilities crystallized.
Goldwater would seek out an opportunity to dissociate himself from the “findings” of the Society’s leader, without, however, casting any aspersions on the Society itself. I, in National Review and in my other writing, would continue to expose Welch and his thinking to scorn and derision. “You know how to do that,” said Jay Hall.
I volunteered to go further. Unless Welch himself disowned his operative fallacy, National Review would oppose any support for the society.
“How would you define the Birch fallacy?” Jay Hall asked.
“The fallacy,” I said, “is the assumption that you can infer subjective intention from objective consequence: we lost China to the Communists, therefore the President of the United States and the Secretary of State wished China to go to the Communists.”
“I like that,” Goldwater said.
What would Russell Kirk do? He was straightforward. “Me? I’ll just say, if anybody gets around to asking me, that the guy is loony and should be put away.”
“Put away in Alaska?” I asked, mock-seriously. The wisecrack traced to Robert Welch’s expressed conviction, a year or so earlier, that the state of Alaska was being prepared to house anyone who doubted his doctrine that fluoridated water was a Communist-backed plot to weaken the minds of the American public.
I’m sure there are hundreds of such instances of where Buckley helped to guide the G.O.P. to the ideology she has become today. I encourage you to read the entire link.




Purging the movement of its reactionary elements was one of Bill’s triumphs. He moved us into the mainstream. Good point, E!
Purging the movement of its reactionary elements? Seriously?
Sadly, No.
Come on guys, who do you think the John Birch nuts vote for? And who do you think relies on their votes every election.
We on the left are stuck with Code Pink and the “Let it Happen on Purpose” (LIHOP) freaks. You guys get the Minutemen and the Birchers.
I’m personally happy to take the Minutemen and even the Birchers (anybody remember Mrs. Putnam from the CCU?) over Code Pink, Moveon.org and all the rest of the Lefty loonies anyday. The difference in our party is that the Birchers and the like don’t control the agenda and the message, not so true in the Democratic party. They’ve sold out to the rabid Left.
Here we go with a link to the uber-excrementalists again! The wackos have to vote for somebody Andre. The difference is neither the GOP, nor the conservative movement cater to those freaks.
BTW Andre, is there some kind of award for the best in indirect, obtuse, vile potty humor? There is some kind of immense power at Sadly that is motivated by self hatred! How many references to genitalia and excrement can be packed into a single thread? Talk about contributing to a stereotype.
Andre does it smell where you have shoved your head? Because this link was highly insulting my friend. Did you post it at Amanda’s site too? Hatred is sooooooo much fun don’t ya know?
Really Andre, those sites (left or right) are like a bunch of foul mouthed 12 year old girls text messaging gossip about each other. Pathetic. The lunatic fringes can’t get a long with each other even in a trendy way; how sad.
Buckley did indeed purge the respectable right of its extremist element. Some on the left have tried to do that for them, as well, but Andre, Wes, and the ilk slandered them as betrayers.
I love how quickly the focus changes to suit the argument. Andre never mentioned MoveOn.org. YOU guys did. And only when you mention that group (decidedly NOT on the fringes, certainly not moreso than the “let’s assassinate Hugo Chavez”, a group that has gotten FAR more play and credibility come election time) did you actually make the argument that the Democratic party caters to the “loonies”.
And DFV, as much as you might consider the only serious Democrats to be Republicans (albeit moderate ones), we don’t. If a politician has no progressive economic policy, no progressive foreign policy, no progressive social policy, then why should we be expected to support them? I don’t want any politician who says the party needs to move further to the right when it’s already one of the weakest liberal parties in the democratic world.