Constitution Club

Obama should still not be president

Posted in 2008 Presidential Election, 2008 Presidential campaigns, Liberals, Politics, blogging by Dave - the Infidel Sage on July 23rd, 2008

Obama and a cigarette

Recently Watchblog, a site I write for from time to time, had a catastrophic server meltdown. The former site editor decided to take the opportunity to escape from the reservation and start his own website while preserving the original watchblog style, format and concept. He invited yours truly to join his limited stable of writers on the new site named Poliwatch. Today my first post is up. It is a new and improved version of my Top Ten Reasons Barack Obama Should Not Be President. Be sure to check it out on the new site.

Updated: And I just got ‘fired” for making the mistake of letting the owner of Watchblog know about this and for a couple of other emails that were circulating among the watchblog forum writers in regards to this. Easy come, easy go. I’ve been “fired” before, but never with such hostility, name-calling and false assumptions. Good stuff. Politics and Punditry is not for puffballs and the thin skinned.

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

6 Responses to 'Obama should still not be president'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Obama should still not be president'.

  1. E the Wise said, on July 23rd, 2008 at 9:41 pm

    I may have to check the by-laws of members belonging to other blogs beside conclub with a limited stable of writers.

    You may have to undergo a special disciplinary committee hearing in August at the Cork in Fort Collins. Convictions carry penalties of Jaeger bombs and tequilla shots.

  2. hairybeast said, on July 23rd, 2008 at 10:46 pm

    Give him the taser! THE TASER!

  3. Dave - the Infidel Sage said, on July 23rd, 2008 at 10:59 pm

    Of course I encourage each and every member of Conclub to venture out from our little domain to bless the world with their pontifications. Conclub always get my rantings first, aren’t you lucky?

  4. E the Wise said, on July 23rd, 2008 at 11:23 pm

    We’ll just have to let the process sort it out. I suggest bringing an attorney to the committee hearing.

  5. Falze said, on July 24th, 2008 at 6:19 am

    Interesting site…although I notice the first 3 “independent” posts all bash Bush. That just screams ‘fair site’ to me.

  6. Dave - the Infidel Sage said, on July 24th, 2008 at 9:03 am

    It’s not a ‘fair’ site by any stretch of the imagination. The just happen to publish my work. I’m nearly the sole voice for reason on both watchblog and now poliwatch. Does DFV count as an attorney for me? At least we’ll know he’ll be present. Is that a conflict of interest?

Leave a Reply